Weve 'been opus in a user acceptationem testing (UAT) quod environment, prout comparatur ad progressum, mortuus est tarda.
Suus turpis elit using FBA, SQL 2008, SSRS telam et extensa super Penitus applications pervia usura https, Quaestio est igitur dura inuestigandum.
Nam priore client, usi sumus FBA cum LDAP partes provisor (et sociari provisor). One of my colleagues, multo magis quam callidus, determined that the "out of the box" LDAP partes provisor, cum dicitur quod environment, wasn’t scaling well. To solve this problem for that client, he implemented a nice caching scheme in a custom role provider.
Hoc simile videbatur, so we looked into replicating that solution to the today’s client. As I was debugging that, Animadverti quod hoc nuntio frequenter apparent Ratio stipes (a vicis Visum):
A worker process with process id of ‘XXX’ serving application pool ‘Home – 80’ has requested a recycle because it reached its virtual memory limit.
Ego tulit hoc intelligitur quod usque app est piscina redivivus, et id explicare nimis saepe effectus problema.
I looked at the app pool’s properties and its "Recycling" page showed that the property "Maximum virtual memory (in megabytes)" had been set to true and had been set to 5000. That seems like enough, but I decided to unset the value and that had an immediate positive effect. No more app pool recycling. No more mysterious slow-downs and pauses.
I don’t really understand the underlying "stuff" quod agitur ibi, sed manifeste aliquid genus causae / effectus rei iam aguntur et pro, in environment UAT est utilis.
</finem>
Phil Wicklund